Skip to content
Detoxible
Recovery

How to Support a Loved One in Recovery

Most advice here is well-meant opinion. One approach has actual trial evidence behind it — and it is not the one families are usually pointed towards first.

Jordan Blake 3 min read Updated August 9, 2026
Two mugs of tea and two chairs pulled close

Most writing about supporting someone through addiction is sincere, humane and completely unevidenced. That is worth saying at the top, because this is an area where confident advice is cheap and the stakes are high.

There is one meaningful exception, and it is not the approach families are usually sent to first.

The one thing with trials behind it

Community Reinforcement and Family Training — CRAFT — trains the person doing the supporting. Not the person using. It teaches communication that does not escalate, how to reinforce non-using behaviour, how to withdraw from conflict safely, and how to look after yourself while doing it.

A meta-analysis pooled four randomised trials covering 264 family members and compared it directly with the two things families are more often offered.

Two plain ceramic mugs of tea placed close together on a pale grey stone table, one faintly steaming, with two wooden chair backs out of focus behind
CRAFT produced three times more patient engagement than Al-Anon/Nar-Anon … twice the engagement of the Johnson Institute intervention.
Roozen, de Waart & van der Kroft, Addiction, 2010

Roughly two-thirds of treatment-resistant individuals entered treatment, typically after four to six sessions with the family member alone. The comparison with the Johnson Institute intervention — the planned confrontation, the assembled family, the ultimatum — matters particularly, because that is the version most people picture when they imagine “doing something”. It engaged about half as many.

What that does and does not prove

Be careful with the number. Four trials and 264 people is a small evidence base for a claim about human relationships, and these trials measured one outcome: did the person enter treatment. That is a good outcome. It is not the only one that matters to you.

Al-Anon comes off worse on that specific measure, and it would be dishonest to hide it. It would be equally dishonest to conclude Al-Anon fails, because getting a relative into treatment is not what Al-Anon sets out to do. Its aim is the wellbeing of the person attending — which these trials did not measure. The two are not competing at the same thing.

So: if your goal right now is getting someone into treatment, ask about CRAFT. If your goal is surviving this yourself, a family support group is aimed at exactly that.

What generalises from it

The CRAFT findings point in a consistent direction, and it is the opposite of the instinct most people have.

  • Confrontation underperforms. The intervention-style approach was tested and beaten.
  • You have more influence over your own behaviour than theirs, and the trials suggest changing yours moves the outcome more.
  • Reinforce what you want to see. Attention and warmth when someone is not using does more than pressure when they are.
  • Do not shield them from every consequence. Removing the results of using also removes reasons to stop.
  • Your own support is part of the mechanism, not a luxury. CRAFT includes it deliberately.

Where the evidence stops

Everything else in this article is judgement, so treat it that way: listening without a verdict attached, learning about dependence as a health condition, expecting setbacks rather than a straight line, and holding boundaries you can actually keep. These are reasonable. None of them has a trial behind it, and anyone telling you otherwise is overselling.

The bottom line

Ask a service about CRAFT by name — it is under-offered and it has the best evidence here. Use a family support group for your own sake, and judge it on that. And be sceptical of confident advice in this area, including the confident parts of this page, because outside of one small set of trials nobody actually knows.

References

Each source is listed against the claim it supports, so you can check the pairing rather than take the list on trust.

  1. 1. Supports: “Across four randomised trials with 264 participants, CRAFT produced three times more treatment engagement than Al-Anon/Nar-Anon and twice that of the Johnson Institute intervention, engaging roughly two-thirds of treatment-resistant individuals after four to six sessions.”

    Community reinforcement and family training: an effective option to engage treatment-resistant substance-abusing individuals in treatment — Roozen HG, de Waart R, van der Kroft P . Addiction, 2010 .

#recovery#family#support#craft

Written by

Jordan Blake

Health journalist focused on recovery, harm reduction and nicotine cessation, covering addiction policy and treatment access.

Related reading